| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Heilan Rover
Joined: 24 Dec 2018
Posts: 534
Location: Lorient
|
 Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 10:59 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| TxRover wrote: | | wellyboot wrote: |
Wonder what this was about. £2600 paid out to BRS |
“The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £2,615.77 (net).”
The Rovers didn’t even respond to the complaint. |
Tex, Rovers would not have responded because it would have cost at least £7,000 to send a Lawyer to defend the club at a tribunal.
So, even if were were innocent of any wrong doing and we had in fact legitimately deducted his wages, it would have been cheaper for the club to simply pay the claimant and avoid the extra cost. Once you are at the tribunal stage, this is often the path innocent companies choose to take. Financially it is the lesser of the two evils.
The fact we paid out does NOT necessarily mean BRS had a legitimate claim. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Vinnie
Joined: 12 Jul 2008
Posts: 7997
Location: None Of Your Business
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 1:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Neil M wrote: | | Bad publicity and flies in the face of the Rovers' traditionally good reputation of treating players well. |
This.Doesn,t show the club in a good light
Might have missed it but it doesn,t say we have paid out
_________________
THERES FIVE OF ME |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Armagh Rover
Joined: 25 Jul 2008
Posts: 5596
Location: Nottinghamshire
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 1:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Not another blooper by the people behind the scene, this has never happened before with players no matter how bad they were, .............. thanks for bringing the club into disrepute yet again whoever you are |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
TxRover
Joined: 02 Jun 2018
Posts: 3211
Location: North Texas, USA
|
| Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Heilan Rover wrote: | | TxRover wrote: | | wellyboot wrote: |
Wonder what this was about. £2600 paid out to BRS |
“The respondent has made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and is ordered to pay the claimant the sum of £2,615.77 (net).”
The Rovers didn’t even respond to the complaint. |
Tex, Rovers would not have responded because it would have cost at least £7,000 to send a Lawyer to defend the club at a tribunal.
So, even if were were innocent of any wrong doing and we had in fact legitimately deducted his wages, it would have been cheaper for the club to simply pay the claimant and avoid the extra cost. Once you are at the tribunal stage, this is often the path innocent companies choose to take. Financially it is the lesser of the two evils.
The fact we paid out does NOT necessarily mean BRS had a legitimate claim. |
I figured as much, wasn’t complaining, just commenting. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
