View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Vinnie
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 8000 Location: None Of Your Business
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cuparman wrote: | You are a sad bunch.
There is “ hearsay” everywhere on this site.
You are poor human beings and OBVIOUSLY are not church going OR believing.
He WAS NOT FOUND GUILTY OF RAPE IN A CRIMINAL COURT.
ANY PENANCE HAS BEEN PAID.
RZ is correct about media today, everyone wants on the bandwagon.
I have no idea about more than a handful around me and I don’t go to bed at night wishing there was an exclusion zone around me.
Living your life like that, you would never sleep. And I would NEVER HOUND A PERSON WITHOUT 100% unequivocal PROOF, and even if there was and the penalty had been paid, I would leave it there .
IMO, There are a lot of VERY SPITEFUL people spouting rubbish about something that has nothing to do with them.
And just because there is a lot of you spouting off does NOT win you anything else other than the “tag” ......look here everybody.....I am virtue signaller.
Go voice your hatred elsewhere.
The problem this club has now is being DRIVEN BY PEOPLE THAT SHOULD NO BETTER.
YOU CERTAINLY AIN’t CHRISTIANS!! |
Respect others view and opinons or maybe discussion forums are not for you _________________ THERES FIVE OF ME |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wolfman Jack

Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 10373 Location: Pawtucket Brewery
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | I,ll repeat myself,why would he show remorse for something he believed he didnt do or happen? |
At some time we all thought we never did something, however I doubt many of us have been told TWICE by a judge to say that you did. _________________ Hope he's got plenty Rovers action to comment on tonight.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cuparman
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 1669 Location: Irvine
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vinnie wrote: | Valleyboy wrote: | Out of touch, Cuparman. Without going into the details here what he and the other player did was utterly wrong. Lawyer on radio this morning couldn’t understand how he wasn’t prosecuted given the evidence available to the Civil Court. It’s the legal system that needs remedy (eg the accused can choose not to be questioned). It’s a very bad association fir the club, and stupid business apart from any moral aspect. |
Not enough evidence to secure a verdict of " beyond reasonable doubt" the reason given by an expert on the nine last night .
Civil case is on the basis of it more than likely it happened than not |
No denying there was an incident.
BUT, if he was guilty of RAPE,......THERE WOULD BE EVIDENCE AND HE WOULD HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED..
IF I owned the club, I would wait for the the noise to calm down.
IF the club got into financial problems because of this, and lost its support due to people continuing to harangue the club , I would flog it, or redevelop it into housing.
Fortunately its not my problem. _________________ Born a Rover Live a Rover Die a Rover |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Parker Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1778 Location: About half way between the place I was and the place I intend to be
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wolfman Jack wrote: | Quote: | I,ll repeat myself,why would he show remorse for something he believed he didnt do or happen? |
At some time we all thought we never did something, however I doubt many of us have been told TWICE by a judge to say that you did. |
Being a cynic its so much more likely that any show/statement of remorse would indicate guilt and therefore a legal criminal case could potentially be reopened on that basis. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vinnie
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 8000 Location: None Of Your Business
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wolfman Jack wrote: | Quote: | I,ll repeat myself,why would he show remorse for something he believed he didnt do or happen? |
At some time we all thought we never did something, however I doubt many of us have been told TWICE by a judge to say that you did. |
Yes but he doesn,t think he did
Judged more than likely he did than not
Anyway theres never going to be an all round agreement on this matter _________________ THERES FIVE OF ME |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Armagh Rover
Joined: 25 Jul 2008 Posts: 5596 Location: Nottinghamshire
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh hello, the New Raith Rovers thread on the other channel has vanished |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Cuparman
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 1669 Location: Irvine
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Vinnie wrote: | Wolfman Jack wrote: | Quote: | I,ll repeat myself,why would he show remorse for something he believed he didnt do or happen? |
At some time we all thought we never did something, however I doubt many of us have been told TWICE by a judge to say that you did. |
Yes but he doesn,t think he did
Judged more than likely he did than not
Anyway theres never going to be an all round agreement on this matter |
You are exactly right vinnie.
But if this DOES NOT BLOWOVER......WE COULD ACTUALLY BE IN DANGER OF LOSING THE CLUB.....BRICKS, MORTAR ETC
 _________________ Born a Rover Live a Rover Die a Rover |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Parker Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1778 Location: About half way between the place I was and the place I intend to be
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 1:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cuparman wrote: | Vinnie wrote: | Valleyboy wrote: | Out of touch, Cuparman. Without going into the details here what he and the other player did was utterly wrong. Lawyer on radio this morning couldn’t understand how he wasn’t prosecuted given the evidence available to the Civil Court. It’s the legal system that needs remedy (eg the accused can choose not to be questioned). It’s a very bad association fir the club, and stupid business apart from any moral aspect. |
Not enough evidence to secure a verdict of " beyond reasonable doubt" the reason given by an expert on the nine last night .
Civil case is on the basis of it more than likely it happened than not |
No denying there was an incident.
BUT, if he was guilty of RAPE,......THERE WOULD BE EVIDENCE AND HE WOULD HAVE BEEN PROSECUTED..
IF I owned the club, I would wait for the the noise to calm down.
IF the club got into financial problems because of this, and lost its support due to people continuing to harangue the club , I would flog it, or redevelop it into housing.
Fortunately its not my problem. |
I'm sorry Cuperman, but your capitalised statement there is incorrect, there are many reasons that evidence of this type of crime cannot be found or presented, mostly, like most crimes of this nature, its never done out in the open or in front of a witness and similarly, victims sometimes cannot report it quick enough whether thats through initial shame that this has happened to them, shock and confusion, peer pressure, victim blaming or so many other reasons that we probably cannot even delve into because we've never been in that position.
Its worth noting that only 13% of reported cases of this type go to court (based on 2021 stats) and thats because the system massively, MASSIVELY fails women. The vast majority never even get to court through a lack of support, huge amounts of victim blaming, and underfunding throughout the system.
Let's be absolutely blunt about this, the majority of people (predominantly male) indicted in these cases don't get convicted because they are innocent, they don't get convicted because the barriers for the victims are so high.
You're right in one thing, none of us were there, we can only go on what we've heard, read, understood and decided upon as individuals, thats generally how opinions are formed and allows us all to make personal and moralistic choices based on what we know and believe in.
For me, I actually feel bad for him in some way, he deserves to be able to get on with his life, of course he does. But at the same time, I don't want someone with this history, rightly or wrongly, to be associated to my club and be presented as a role model for kids around the club, like most footballers are (and predominantly goalscorers). Its a very tough line to be classed as a community, family orientated club and hire someone with this background to be one of the public faces of the club.
The club have made their decision and as such, this fallout has happened which the BoD, the manager, and to an extent the player, have to handle now. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Wolfman Jack

Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 10373 Location: Pawtucket Brewery
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Armagh Rover wrote: | Oh hello, the New Raith Rovers thread on the other channel has vanished |
It's being parked for the moment to remove various comments by Trolls and to protect the site from the long arm of the law.
It will be back once it's been dry cleaned. _________________ Hope he's got plenty Rovers action to comment on tonight.... |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Vinnie
Joined: 12 Jul 2008 Posts: 8000 Location: None Of Your Business
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 2:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Cuparman wrote: | Vinnie wrote: | Wolfman Jack wrote: | Quote: | I,ll repeat myself,why would he show remorse for something he believed he didnt do or happen? |
At some time we all thought we never did something, however I doubt many of us have been told TWICE by a judge to say that you did. |
Yes but he doesn,t think he did
Judged more than likely he did than not
Anyway theres never going to be an all round agreement on this matter |
You are exactly right vinnie.
But if this DOES NOT BLOWOVER......WE COULD ACTUALLY BE IN DANGER OF LOSING THE CLUB.....BRICKS, MORTAR ETC
 |
Agree with you on that _________________ THERES FIVE OF ME |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Gary Parker Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2008 Posts: 1778 Location: About half way between the place I was and the place I intend to be
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
TxRover
Joined: 02 Jun 2018 Posts: 3214 Location: North Texas, USA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hankey_Bannister wrote: | As for my beliefs I'm with the Peoples Front of Judea. Up the PFJ  |
I’d like to note that I, as a representative of the Judean Peoples Front (Hut Hut the JPF)…
More seriously, he was never tried in Criminal Court…he still can be…and thus was never found guilty or not guilty. That doesn’t make him innocent. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Hankey_Bannister
Joined: 29 May 2021 Posts: 237
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
TxRover wrote: | Hankey_Bannister wrote: | As for my beliefs I'm with the Peoples Front of Judea. Up the PFJ  |
I’d like to note that I, as a representative of the Judean Peoples Front (Hut Hut the JPF) |
 |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Neil M
Joined: 16 Aug 2008 Posts: 2479 Location: Aberdeen
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Something is not right about the media's reaction and coverage to RRFC (as opposed to Goodwillie himself). USA Today - WT*? Half its reader base might not even know, where Scotland even is! Most of them will be too busy sweating over Russia and Iran to even give a damn about some obscure soccer club in "Ireland or wherever". I am not aware of a lynch mob having surrounded Broadwood with torches and pitchforks, yet that is kind of what is happening to the Rovers now. What I am saying is that there is something very contrived about the way we have been targeted by the media. Have some people in high up places sought to make a political example of RRFC? You can fill in the blanks yourselves.
Let me be clear - I do not like David Goodwillie at all. Before a civil court found him guilty, he was a despicable character, with convictions for a string of assaults. In one such attack, a nightclub bouncer - who was only doing his job - was beaten unconscious. On every occassion he seemed to get off with a slap on the wrist. Some hoodie on a council estate would be serving life, if they had committed those crimes! You have to wonder why Goodwillie got off so lightly each time. Did someone very powerful have his back? On Sacked In The Morning, Craig Levein alluded to (but did not name) a player who assaulted people for fun - and who was headed for years in prison. Who might that have been? I am not aware that Goodwillie was cleared of rape by a jury in a criminal court. I did read that the charges were dropped, as corroboration would have been needed in a criminal case. Apparantly a civil court reaches a verdict based on probabilty. Goodwillie had to pay his victim £100k.
Is Goodwillie a reformed character? I don't know - and I don't care. Should he be given a chance to move on and reform and build a better life with his wife and family now? I would say yes at this stage- but NOT with Raith Rovers Football Club. A new identity and a move to the Caribbean might be an idea - for him, his family and first and foremost for his victims - (yes the "s" on the end was intentional).
If Goodwillie stays with Rovers, I would more get a shiver every time he scored than anything else. Even if he got us promoted, it would somehow feel hollow and empty. There is little chance of that now - whether he stays or whether he goes. Still, there were people on here who wanted to sign him before he signed for Clyde. There would have been a backlash for his signing - no matter what. You do have to ask though - if it was not for this media hysteria, would everybody be saying what they are saying? Some would - but others maybe not. The hysteria has made us look at the man's past in closer detail. It is not pretty.
It is hard to see how to get Goodwillie out now, without very serious damage. If the club pays him off, it will be slated for rewarding him - never mind from fans' hard-earned-cash. If he walks, his career will be over. He knows it and he might not agree to do that. If he stays, it could be the club that goes to the wall. It is a Catch 22. Whichever way, the damage is already done.
That brings me onto the bit that will get me slated to death - but I am going to say it, because it is how I feel. With 20/20 hindsight, the Goodwillie signing has been a PR disaster. Does anyone imagine that John Sim or John McGlynn got up this morning feeling glad that they signed him? I have spoken with both men in the past and got a very good feeling about them - both nice and sincere people. While it was not rocket science that the signing would alienate women who had any kind of dealings with the club, nobody could have foreseen the media frenzy over a footballer who has been at Clyde for years - and only ever mentioned when he scored.
John Sim and John McGlynn are good men. While the decision was wrong, their hearts are in the right place. They both eat, sleep and breathe Raith Rovers Football Club. They will be hurting as much as anyone right now.
Do we really want them to just leave and bring in another Danny Smith, another Gary Locke or another Claude Anelka?
When we screamed for a striker, I don't recall anyone on here saying that they would stop supporting the Rovers, if Goodwillie signed. Maybe we should have been more careful for what we wished for. Maybe we should have made our opinions clear then - not now. While many would have torn up their season tickets regardless, the bulk of the reaction now seems to be (rightly or wrongly) about the media hysteria and the awful implications for the club. I will not make me any friends on here by saying it, but while I truly hope that Goodwillie will be gone - ASAP - I do hope that John Sim, John McGlynn and Paul Smith will stay at the club and sort out and ride out all this mess. I have no doubt that they will now have a real will to do so. They may well be our best bet - to save the club from oblivion. Why? Because they do care - no matter what - mistakes or no mistakes - look at what they have done for the club up to now. Bearing all that in mind' let's be careful what we wish for! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
RealNotFizz

Joined: 28 Jun 2010 Posts: 1363 Location: Kirkcaldy
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2022 9:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Neil M wrote: | Something is not right about the media's reaction and coverage to RRFC (as opposed to Goodwillie himself). USA Today - WT*? Half its reader base might not even know, where Scotland even is! Most of them will be too busy sweating over Russia and Iran to even give a damn about some obscure soccer club in "Ireland or wherever". I am not aware of a lynch mob having surrounded Broadwood with torches and pitchforks, yet that is kind of what is happening to the Rovers now. What I am saying is that there is something very contrived about the way we have been targeted by the media. Have some people in high up places sought to make a political example of RRFC? You can fill in the blanks yourselves.
Let me be clear - I do not like David Goodwillie at all. Before a civil court found him guilty, he was a despicable character, with convictions for a string of assaults. In one such attack, a nightclub bouncer - who was only doing his job - was beaten unconscious. On every occassion he seemed to get off with a slap on the wrist. Some hoodie on a council estate would be serving life, if they had committed those crimes! You have to wonder why Goodwillie got off so lightly each time. Did someone very powerful have his back? On Sacked In The Morning, Craig Levein alluded to (but did not name) a player who assaulted people for fun - and who was headed for years in prison. Who might that have been? I am not aware that Goodwillie was cleared of rape by a jury in a criminal court. I did read that the charges were dropped, as corroboration would have been needed in a criminal case. Apparantly a civil court reaches a verdict based on probabilty. Goodwillie had to pay his victim £100k.
Is Goodwillie a reformed character? I don't know - and I don't care. Should he be given a chance to move on and reform and build a better life with his wife and family now? I would say yes at this stage- but NOT with Raith Rovers Football Club. A new identity and a move to the Caribbean might be an idea - for him, his family and first and foremost for his victims - (yes the "s" on the end was intentional).
If Goodwillie stays with Rovers, I would more get a shiver every time he scored than anything else. Even if he got us promoted, it would somehow feel hollow and empty. There is little chance of that now - whether he stays or whether he goes. Still, there were people on here who wanted to sign him before he signed for Clyde. There would have been a backlash for his signing - no matter what. You do have to ask though - if it was not for this media hysteria, would everybody be saying what they are saying? Some would - but others maybe not. The hysteria has made us look at the man's past in closer detail. It is not pretty.
It is hard to see how to get Goodwillie out now, without very serious damage. If the club pays him off, it will be slated for rewarding him - never mind from fans' hard-earned-cash. If he walks, his career will be over. He knows it and he might not agree to do that. If he stays, it could be the club that goes to the wall. It is a Catch 22. Whichever way, the damage is already done.
That brings me onto the bit that will get me slated to death - but I am going to say it, because it is how I feel. With 20/20 hindsight, the Goodwillie signing has been a PR disaster. Does anyone imagine that John Sim or John McGlynn got up this morning feeling glad that they signed him? I have spoken with both men in the past and got a very good feeling about them - both nice and sincere people. While it was not rocket science that the signing would alienate women who had any kind of dealings with the club, nobody could have foreseen the media frenzy over a footballer who has been at Clyde for years - and only ever mentioned when he scored.
John Sim and John McGlynn are good men. While the decision was wrong, their hearts are in the right place. They both eat, sleep and breathe Raith Rovers Football Club. They will be hurting as much as anyone right now.
Do we really want them to just leave and bring in another Danny Smith, another Gary Locke or another Claude Anelka?
When we screamed for a striker, I don't recall anyone on here saying that they would stop supporting the Rovers, if Goodwillie signed. Maybe we should have been more careful for what we wished for. Maybe we should have made our opinions clear then - not now. While many would have torn up their season tickets regardless, the bulk of the reaction now seems to be (rightly or wrongly) about the media hysteria and the awful implications for the club. I will not make me any friends on here by saying it, but while I truly hope that Goodwillie will be gone - ASAP - I do hope that John Sim, John McGlynn and Paul Smith will stay at the club and sort out and ride out all this mess. I have no doubt that they will now have a real will to do so. They may well be our best bet - to save the club from oblivion. Why? Because they do care - no matter what - mistakes or no mistakes - look at what they have done for the club up to now. Bearing all that in mind' let's be careful what we wish for! |
Sorry, but they clearly don't care about any women involved with the club. Assuming they even gave them a second thought. |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|